![]() I run on an i7-7700 with 16G and SSDs and performance is quite good. More memory and more CPUs (and better performance from each CPU) is always better. To run reasonably well both the host OS and the vm's virtual disk should be on SSD. To run a Windows 10 guest on a Windows 10 host that adds up to 8G and 4 CPUs for basic performance. Windows 10 needs at least 4G of memory and at least 2 CPUs, whether it is in a physical machine or a vm. The main things to affect vm performance are memory, CPU and disk performance. Why would the ability to run Hyper-V affect the performance of VirtualBox? Actually enabling Hyper-V on Windows Pro will certainly kill VirtualBox at present. How does Hyper-V come into the discussion? As you say, Hyper-V cannot run on Windows Home. I usually use Pro, but I have run these vms in VirtualBox on Home and did not notice any difference. I really don't know what you are trying to say.Īs far as I am aware, there is no obvious difference in VirtualBox performance between Windows 10 Home and Pro. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |